Two-Stage Risk Analysis Application in Maritime Tanker Transportation

Mücahit  DEMIRCİ; Ozan Hikmet ARICAN

doi:10.5281/zenodo.14955830

Yazarlar

Mücahit DEMIRCİ Kocaeli Üniversitesi https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6243-7785
Ozan Hikmet ARICAN Kocaeli Üniversitesi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-6112

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14955830

Anahtar Kelimeler:

FMEA, Fuzzy AHP, Tanker Transport, Risk Analysis, Maritime Management, Marine Transport Engineering

Özet

Abstract

In maritime transport, tanker ships have a strategic advantage in company fleets. It is necessary to evaluate the risks that may occur in this area. The aim of this study is to determine the risks that may occur in maritime tanker transport and to propose preventive measures in this direction. In addition, determining the importance levels of risk phenomena is another issue aimed within the scope of the study. In this context, a two-stage evaluation process was applied in the study. In the first phase of the study, Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) was applied. Risk factors determined in line with the views of experts in the field were put forward and their risk priority number was determined. Afterwards, preventive actions were identified in the study. In the second phase of the study, Fuzzy AHP method was applied. In this direction, risk factors were categorised and made comparable among themselves. Importance levels were determined within the scope of the opinions of sector representatives who are experts in their field. Thus, the objectivity level of the study was improved. According to the results of the study, the importance level of the administration and maintenance risk group was found to be the highest. Under this heading, maintenance deficiencies on board, transport of chemical hazardous materials and failure to manage them properly, failure to supply spare parts and critical equipment are listed. The technical failures group was evaluated as the other most important risk group. Under this heading, there are rudder equipment failure, machinery failure and generator failure risk situations.

Referanslar

Aktaş, İ. S., Menlik, T., & Sözen, A. (2020). Akıllı Bir Şebekedeki Risk İndikatörlerinin Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ile Modellenmesi. Politeknik Dergisi, 23(2), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.669465

Arıcan, O. H., Arslan, O., & Unal, A. U. (2023). The Importance of CATZOC in Passage Planning and Prioritization of Strategies for Safe Navigation. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 12(4), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1333432

Arican, O. H., Arslan, O., Unal, A. U., & Özbag, G. (2024). Developing a Comprehensive Yacht Captain Selection Model for Enhancing Competitiveness in Yacht Tourism: a Fuzzy AHP Approach. Journal of Maritime Research, 21(3), 108-117.

Aydın, U., & Atak, Ü. (2020). Yük taşımacılığı için bulanık EDAS yöntemi ile taşıma modu seçimi. Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 3(1), 24-33.

Başar, E. (2010). Investigation into marine traffic and a risky area in the Turkish straits system: Canakkale strait. Transport, 25(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.01

Büyük, N., & BAYER, D. (2022). Tanker Gemilerinde Kargo İşlemleri Esnasındaki Yangın Risklerinin Kök Sebeplerinin Tespiti ve Bow Tie ile Analizi. Denizcilik Araştırmaları Dergisi: Amfora, 1(1), 1-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/jomaramphora.62290

Chai, T., Weng, J., De-qi, X., (2017). Development of a quantitative risk assessment model for ship collisions in fairways, Safety Science, Volume 91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.018.

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2

Chen, P., Mou, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Risk analysis of maritime accidents in an estuary: a case study of Shenzhen Waters. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie, (42 (114)), 54-62.

Elidolu, G., Uflaz, E., Aydin, M., Celik, E., Akyuz, E., & Arslan, O. (2022). Numerical risk analysis of gas freeing process in oil/chemical tanker ships. Ocean Engineering, 266, 113082

Ensari Özay, M., Köten, H., & Can, E. (2021). İstanbul Boğazı Geçişi Güvenlik Açığı: Olası Tanker Patlama Simülasyonu. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 7(3), 509-516. https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.980054

Eren, E. R., & Pamuk, O. (2020). Hata Türü Ve Etkileri Analizi Yönteminin Konfeksiyon Sektöründe Uygulanması. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3), 1533-1546. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.732515

Fu, S., & Riska, K. (2023). Towards functional design for the risk management system of maritime accidents in ice-covered Arctic waters from resilience perspectives. Proceedings of the ASME 2023 42nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2023). https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2023-101081

Gao, F. (2022). An integrated risk analysis method for tanker cargo handling operation using the cloud model and DEMATEL method. Ocean Engineering, 266, 113021.

Goerlandt, F., & Montewka, J. (2015). A framework for risk analysis of maritime transportation systems: A case study for oil spill from tankers in a ship–ship collision. Safety Science, 76, 42-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.009

Han, M., Zhang, X., Cong, L., & Peng, C. (2024). Risk analysis for fire and explosion accidents on chemical tanker under fuzzy-AHP approach. 74. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3039519

Kamal, B. (2019). Deniz Taşımacılığında Risk Sermayesi. Kent Akademisi, 12(3), 618-633. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.605909

Liu, P., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Wu, X. (2024). An improved FMEA method based on the expert trust network for maritime transportation risk management, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 238, Part A, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121705.

Melnyk, O., Bychkovsky, Y., Shumylo, O., Onyshchenko, S., Onishchenko, O., Voloshyn, A., & Cheredarchuk, N. (2022). Study of the risk assessment quality dependence on the ships accidents analysis. Scientific Bulletin" Mircea cel Batran" Naval Academy, 25(1), 136-146.

https://doi.org/10.21279/1454-864X-22-I1-015

Mert, A., & Çetinyokuş, S. (2020). Denizyolu tehlikeli madde taşımacılığına yönelik kazaların analizi. Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, 10(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/0.14230/johut760

Mızrak Özfırat, P. (2014). Bulanık Önceliklendirme Metodu Ve Hata Türü Ve Etkileri Analizini Birleştiren Yeni Bir Risk Analizi Yöntemi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(4), 755-768. https://doi.org/10.17341/gummfd.04423

Montewka, J., Ståhlberg, K., Seppala, T., & Kujala, P. (2010). Elements of risk analysis for collision of oil tankers. Risk, Reliability and Safety, 1005-1013.

Özakın, B. (2021). Sac Malzeme Üretiminde Hata Türleri ve Etkileri Analizi. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi(28), 1204-1209. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1013679

Özbağ, G. K., Arıcan, O. H., & Aydın, O. (2023). Gemi personelinin emniyet iklimi algısı üzerine bir araştırma. İş'te Davranış Dergisi, 8(1), 19-35.

Özdem, G. (2024). Risk Yönetilebilirliği: Deniz Yolu Taşımacılığındaki Riskler Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Socıal Scıences Studıes Journal (SSSJournal), 10(3), 486-493.

Sezer, S. I., Elidolu, G., Akyuz, E., & Arslan, O. (2023). An integrated risk assessment modelling for cargo manifold process on tanker ships under FMECA extended Dempster–Shafer theory and rule-based Bayesian network approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 174, 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.04.024

Sur, J. M., & Kim, D. J. (2020). Comprehensive risk estimation of maritime accident using fuzzy evaluation method – Focusing on fishing vessel accident in Korean waters. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(3), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.013

Szubrycht, T. (2020). Marine accidents as potential crisis situations on the Baltic Sea. Archives of transport, 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.2972

Şişman, B. (2017). Hata Türü Ve Etkileri Analizinde Bulanık Ahp Ve Bulanık Vıkor Yöntemleri İle Otomotiv Sektöründe Risk Değerlendirmesi - Rısk Evaluatıng By Fuzzy Ahp And Fuzzy Vıkor Methods In Faılure Mode And Effects Analysıs For Automotıve Sector. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(18), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.302942

Tarı, R., & İnce, M. R. (2019). Denizyolu Taşımacılığı Piyasası Kapsamında Küresel Ticaret Hacminin Analizi: Markov Rejim Değişim Modeli. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (37), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.35343/kosbed.581404

Tatar, V& Meriç Özer, B(2018).Kıyı Tesislerinde Depolanan Ve Elleçlenen Tehlikeli Maddelerin Yangın Güvenliği Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: Hopa Limanı Tank Terminali Örneği. The Journal of Academic Social Science

Uğurlu, O., Yıldırım, U., Yüksekyıldız, E., Nişancı, R., & Kose, E. R. C. A. N. (2021). Investigation of oil tanker accidents by using GIS. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 157(A2). https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v157iA2.953

Unal, A. U., Arıcan, O. H., & Arslan, O. (2022). Deniz Yolu Taşımacılığında Freight Forwarder Firmalarının Yaşadığı Sorunlar Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Denizcilik Araştırmaları Dergisi: Amfora, 1(2), 1-27.

Vanem, E., Endresen, Ø., & Skjong, R. (2007). Cost-effectiveness criteria for marine oil spill preventive measures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(9), 1354–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.008

Vidmar, P., & Perkovic, M. (2018). Safety assessment of crude oil tankers. Safety Science, 105, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2018.02.009

Westgaard, S., Frydenberg, S., Mitter, K. W., & Jensen, E. F. (2007). Economic and Financial Risk Factors and Tanker Shipping Stock Returns. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.969910

Yetkin, Murat & Mentes, Ayhan & Akyildiz, Hakan & Türkoğlu, Nagihan. (2015). Denizcilik Sektöründe Risk Analizi İçin Karar Verme Yöntemleri (Decision Making Techniques For Risk Analyses in Maritime Industry).

Yıldırım, B. F., & Yeşilyurt, C. (2014). Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Yaklaşımı İle Proje Değer-Lendirme Kriterlerinin Önceliklendirilmesi: Kalkınma Ajansı Örneği. Atatürk İletişim Dergisi, (6), 23-50.

Yılmaz, B. S. (2000). Hata türü ve etki analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(4).

Yılmaz, H., & Şahin, M. E. (2023). Bulanık Mantık Kavramına Genel Bir Bakış. Takvim-i Vekayi, 11(1), 94-129.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3),338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241X.

Zaman, M. B., Santoso, A., & Busse, W. (2020, August). Risk Evaluation of Ferry in the Bali Straits using FMEA Method. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 557, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/557/1/012045

Zampeta, V., & Chondrokoukis, G. (2022). An Empirical Analysis for the Determination of Risk Factors of Work-Related Accidents in the Maritime Transportation Sector. Risks, 10(12), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10120231

Zeng, Q., Yang, L., & Zhang, Q. (2014). Modeling the sailing risk of RoPax ships with Bayesian Network. Transport, 32(4), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2014.943806

Zhou, Q., Wong, Y. D., Loh, H. S., & Yuen, K. F. (2019). ANFIS model for assessing near-miss risk during tanker shipping voyages. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2019.1569765

Two-Stage Risk Analysis Application in Maritime Tanker Transportation

Yazarlar

DOI:

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Özet

Referanslar

İndir

Yayınlanmış

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Sayı

Bölüm

Lisans

Makale Gönder

Dil

Bilgi