A Comparison of Gen X and Gen Z Employees' Perceptions of Organizational Commitment in Port Enterprises Based on the Cultural Dimensions Theory


Abstract views: 179 / PDF downloads: 56

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17058190

Keywords:

Generation X, Generation Z, Organizational Commitment, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions, Port Enterprises, Employee engagement

Abstract

This study comparatively examines the organizational commitment perceptions of Generation X (born between 1965–1980) and Generation Z (born after 1997) employees in the port operations sector within the framework of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory (power distance, individualism–collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity–femininity, long-term vs. short-term orientation, indulgence vs. restraint). The research was conducted using a qualitative design, with semi-structured interviews held with employees from both generational cohorts. The findings reveal significant differences in perceptions of organizational commitment and belonging between the two generations. For instance, Generation X exhibits high power distance, showing respect for hierarchy and authority, and develops a rule-oriented sense of belonging, while Generation Z favors more egalitarian and participatory relationships with their managers. Generation X tends to value collectivist norms and build emotional bonds within the organization, whereas Generation Z emphasizes individual growth, value congruence, and personal achievement as key drivers of commitment. While Generation X associates belonging with stability and clearly defined rules due to their high uncertainty avoidance, Generation Z embraces change but expects transparent communication and managerial support throughout the process. Moreover, Generation X prioritizes achievement and responsibility, reflecting more masculine values, while Generation Z leans toward feminine values, focusing on work-life balance, meaningfulness, and alignment with personal values. Although both generations regard trust and perceptions of fairness as core components of organizational commitment, Generation Z demonstrates greater sensitivity to managerial transparency, openness to change, and social amenities. These findings suggest that understanding intergenerational differences is vital for developing sustainable human resource policies, particularly in strategic and high-turnover industries such as port operations, where tailored organizational and managerial practices are essential for fostering a sense of commitment across generational groups.

 

References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.

Aytaç, G., Çiğdemoğlu, C., Yılmaz, A. A., & Tuzlukaya, Ş. (2023). X, Y, Z Kuşakları perspektifinden çalışma değerleri ve iş-yaşam dengesi [Work values and work-life balance from the perspective of Generations X, Y, Z]. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 58(3), 1736-1751.

Arslan, O., Arıcan, O.H., Ünal, A.U. & Yaramış, A.C. (2021). The Relationship Between Work-Family And Family-Work Conflict And Demographic Characteristics: A Study On Watchkeeping Officers, International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, (Issn:2630-631X) 7(51): 2512-2519.

Arıcan, O.H., Ünal, A.U. (2023). The Effect of Working Conditions of Sefarers Working in Internal Waters on Work Performance as a Result of Leading the Work. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences (IJSHS), 7(2), 133-162.

Balay, R. (2000). Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık [Organizational commitment among administrators and teachers]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Barhate, B., & Dirani, K. M. (2021). Career aspirations of generation Z: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 139–157. DOI: 10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124.

Deloitte. (2021). 2021 Deloitte Global Millennial and Gen Z Survey. (Deloitte tarafından yürütülen küresel Y ve Z kuşağı anket raporu).

Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79–90.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede Insights. (2022). Country Comparison – Turkey. Erişim adresi: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/turkey/ (Türkiye’nin kültürel boyut skorları).

Hou, J., Li, X., & Shi, K. (2011). Workplace belongingness, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Asian Social Science, 7(4), 186-191.

İmamoğlu, S. Z., İnce, H., Türkcan, H., & Atakay, B. (2019). The effect of organizational justice and organizational commitment on knowledge sharing and firm performance. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 899–906.

Kahraman, N. T., & Kalan, Ö. (2024). A cultural analysis of Generation Z’s perception of individualism and collectivism in Turkish television commercials through a Hofstedian lens. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 67, 87–114. DOI: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2024-1508466.

Kovacheva, S. (2020). Global youth culture and emerging homogeneous values. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(5), 555-569.

Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigenerational employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65–76.

Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.

Nazir, S., Shafi, A., Qun, W., Nazir, N., & Tran, Q. D. (2016). Influence of organizational rewards on organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Business and Economic Review, 8(2), 51–74.

Özbek, A. (2021, May 20). X Kuşağı Nedir? Peki Kimler X Kuşağı? [What is Generation X? Who are considered Generation X?]. Abdulkadir Özbek Blog. Retrieved from https://abdulkadirozbek.com.tr/x-kusagi-nedir-peki-kimler-x-kusagi/

Özbağ, G. K., & Arslan, O. (2018). The effects of demographic characteristics on organizational commitment: An investigation on turkish port staff. Journal of Tourism, Economic and Business Sciences, 2, 549-560.

Sargut, A. S. (2001). Kültürlerarası farklılaşma ve yönetim. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.

Smarżewska, D. (2019). Wewnątrzorganizacyjne uwarunkowania lojalności pracowników wobec organizacji [Intra-organizational determinants of employee loyalty to the organization]. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Nowe Tendencje w Zarządzaniu (Vol. 8, pp. 197-206). Toruń, Poland: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: William Morrow.

Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.

Ustaahmetoğlu, E., & Toklu, İ. T. (2023). Z ve X kuşağının bireyci ve kolektivist reklam mesajlarına yönelik tepkilerinin karşılaştırılması. İletişim Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 169–188.

Wagner, R., & Harter, J. K. (2006). 12: The Elements of Great Managing. New York: Gallup Press.

Waworuntu, S. M., et al. (2022). [Kaynak Bilgisi: Gen Z çalışanların iş yaşam dengesi beklentileri üzerine çalışma – tam referans bilgisi orijinal metinde verilmemiştir].

Wziątek-Staśko, A., Michalik, I., & Vveinhardt, J. (2023). Organizational commitment in the assessment of employees of different generations: A research study. European Research Studies Journal, 26(3), 534–555.

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

ASILKAZANCI, E., & ÖZBAĞ, G. K. (2025). A Comparison of Gen X and Gen Z Employees’ Perceptions of Organizational Commitment in Port Enterprises Based on the Cultural Dimensions Theory . PEARSON JOURNAL, 8(33), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17058190